Offshore work changed the family calendar, too
A 2002 study in New Iberia and Morgan City found that predictable time at home mattered alongside wages.
Published
For families tied to offshore work, a good job was partly a question of when someone could come home. A July 2002 study published by the Minerals Management Service found that predictable schedules, dependable pay and benefits helped workers in New Iberia and Morgan City organize their responsibilities onshore.
University of Arizona researchers reported that many families had adapted to rotations of seven days working followed by seven days off, or fourteen followed by fourteen. Longer assignments and greater reliance on workers being called in as needed complicated those arrangements, the 2002 report found. Its point was more specific than simply saying offshore work kept people away: knowing when the absence would end made a difference.
The researchers’ account distinguished jobs that are often grouped together. In their study, production work generally offered the most predictable schedules, commonly seven days on and seven off. Drillers and mariners more often worked fourteen-day assignments, sometimes remaining out for twenty-eight days or longer. Divers could be called for assignments lasting hours or months, according to the report’s summary of work patterns.
Working onshore did not necessarily mean more family time. The 2002 study described fabrication work shaped by shifts and overtime; some of those workers spent less time at home than offshore workers did. The authors also reported that many households depended on overtime earnings in their regular budgets. Time and income could pull in opposite directions.
These findings came from close observation of two communities, rather than a survey of every Louisiana household. The study partnered with fourteen local teacher-researchers, and two university researchers lived in the communities for ten months during 1998–99. The team discussed preliminary findings in twenty-one focus groups in March 2000 and maintained contact through June 2001, according to its methods section.
That history helps explain what an employment total leaves out. The 2002 researchers found that the kind of job, its stability and its schedule shaped family experience alongside the paycheck. Their account describes New Iberia and Morgan City around the turn of the century; it does not establish the schedules or experiences of today’s offshore families.
Was this useful?
Help us keep useful reporting easy to find.